Sign Up Today for Skip Hire Industry News Updates - Free!

Archive for the ‘Readers’ Letters’ Category

You are here: Home » Readers' Letters

SKIP WATCH : “I don’t believe it!”

Posted on: November 21st, 2008 by Dave No Comments

skiphire-victormeldrew.jpg
No, I really don’t believe it! A scheme I considered in a previous issue of The Skip, after another one of my Pot Noodle pondering sessions, has actually made it to fruition! Oh, if only my dear mum could see me now (she’s not dead, she just can’t see very well nowadays).
I’m sure you’ll remember my enthusiasm for a ‘Skip Sharing’ scheme, back in issue 37 of The Skip, when I briefly deviated from my favourite passion to explore the terrible reality of underloaded skips. Well, would you believe it, National “Share-A-Skip” Week has now been officially born! I’m just glad I patented the idea at the time in case it takes off. Oh crap, no I didn’t; that was the re-usable bog roll fiasco.
NSASW_skip-hire.jpg
National “Share-A-Skip” Week 2008 runs from the 10th to the 17th of November and should provide a very welcome boost to the skip hire industry, as well as doing a great job towards reducing fly tipping, skip jacking, wasted skip space and all the needless carbon emissions that come with it. You can read all about it at http://nationalshareaskipweek.co.uk, where you can also find that “Skipjacking Jerk” tune that is currently plaguing my mind to the point of near insanity!
Anyway, I’m excited at the prospect of several people sharing one skip, because that surely increases the chances of more juicy overloaded numbers out there. Not that I’d ever (been seen to) encourage the deliberate overloading of a skip merely to satisfy my own personal, twisted fixation with the delightful spectacle.
OL_Skip_1_TS40.jpg
And that takes me seamlessly, once more, to this month’s ‘overloaded skip porn’! The first beauty, in desperate need of a haircut, was sent to us by Nigel McGillicuddy, of Howard Waste. Nigel said they were “appalled and horrified” by the state of the skip when they turned up to collect it. I suppose it’s a different ball game when you’re the person who actually has to deal with the inconvenience, but I have to say that I felt something more along the lines of “delighted and ever so slightly aroused”!
OL_Skip_2_TS40.jpg
The second skip, courtesy of John Cinnamond, of R Collard Ltd, is a rare classic. On first glance, it looks like a full skip on a full skip (which, as you can imagine, left me quite weak at the knees). But there actually appears to be some kind of mattress convention going on. I only hope they checked them all thoroughly for students before tying them down.
Please keep your overloaded skip photos coming in. Email them to us or post them to – The Skip, Metropolitan House, Station Road, Cheadle Hulme SK8 7GA

You are here: Home » Readers' Letters

What a darling waste of time!

Posted on: June 27th, 2008 by Dave No Comments

Dear The Skip,
In response to your article of issue 33, this government has not got a green policy; it has a mean policy. We all welcome a better environment and responsible Waste Management Companies strive hard to comply.
Albeit, this government does not encourage or reward responsible hardworking companies at all. Instead they continually introduce penalties and taxes etc.
Why do they never provide opportunities or support to enable us to comply? We all know that the reduction in landfill sites is inevitable and an increasing problem but not one that has occurred overnight. Why is there no infrastructure in place?
There is no help with developing future sites for recycling plants etc. Local Councils are not pro-active; they are narrow minded and do not welcome such visual sites. All the brownfield sites available should be utilised for the development of the appropriate area, in particular replacing work where it has previously been lost. Not all businesses are call centres or distribution warehouses. To recycle certain material, the distance to travel outweighs the tipping costs – with respect to fuel costs and time taken this does not help our carbon footprint. If more sites were available this would encourage recycling and sites would be more widespread. We need forward thinking Government representatives but where are they???
Regards,
Debbie Garlick
Potteries Waste Limited.
THE SKIP SAYS: Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Debbie. You raise some very valid points. As for finding any “forward thinking Government representatives” – there’s probably more chance that Elvis is currently working on a policy for rationalising skip permit pricing.

You are here: Home » Readers' Letters

The unseen effects of landfill tax

Posted on: June 17th, 2008 by Dave No Comments

Dear The Skip,
Not too long ago, Mr Darling and Mr Brown decided that they needed a lot more tax to help fill the hole of incompetence they find themselves in. So in their wisdom they decided to ambush the landfill tax with an escalator that has left many in the industry wondering what the hell happened. As one manager from a large national company said to me last year, “The £8 per tonne has caught us all out and it’s going to hurt”. Tough s***, I say, we’ve seen it coming for years and invested – that’s why 98% of all our waste comes through our MRF and that’s why they’ve been caught out. I must confess I find it difficult to sympathise with such comments when the big players’ press departments then come out with announcements such as “They welcome the tax hike and it will help their company”. What a load of bo****ks !
Mr Darling, on the other hand, can sit back safe in the knowledge that companies such as mine and yours will act as unpaid tax collectors, ensuring his money grubbing government will get every penny without even having to negotiate the rate. Likewise, the Landfill sites have no leverage and they’ve no alternative but to pass it on to the waste carriers. I should remind readers that, at this point, the government’s perception is that the landfill tax cascades down to the waste producers and the ‘polluter pay’ principle is achieved.
I’m afraid this is far from the truth, and let it be said that at this point things start to go very badly wrong. Waste collectors have to pass this tax on to their customers, but the finance act from which the landfill tax is spawned makes no provisions for waste carriers and as such it isn’t a tax we have to pass on, but rather an increased cost of working. Consequently, more and more waste producers are finding it fair game to screw their waste collection price down when the tax hike comes around each year.
Quite conveniently, the finance act doesn’t allow for any bad debt relief for waste carriers. So if the waste producer goes bust the waste carrier still has to pay the landfill tax to the site operator. And, just to add a twist of concern for the future, you may like to ponder the fact that the exposure on any bad debt that occurs is escalating each year as landfill tax rises. The effects aren’t just limited to bad debt, because even if you manage to pass on the tax to the waste producer without your prices being screwed down, the increased cost of working naturally increases your company’s turnover and most insurance companies calculate their premiums on T/O, so you will be paying higher insurance charges as the tax snowballs for the treasury.
The Governments tax take doesn’t stop there either, because the landfill tax – or rather your increased cost of working – attracts even more VAT and those increasing insurance premiums are subject to IPT (Insurance Premium Tax) so Mr Darling is on to a right winner!
Just this year alone, our company has responded to over 50 customers seeking a reduction in waste collection charges to offset the effects of the landfill tax. One wonders if sending the annual letter to customers warning them of this Mr Darling’s tax increase is a good idea. I’m sure we would have been better off just filling a skip full of £20 notes and setting them on fire!
Just to give you folks reading this some idea of how bad it is out there – all of our work is contracted with terms and conditions that allow for landfill tax increases, but this counts for nothing as waste producers take matters into their own hands. Indeed, as I write this wake up call, our company is dealing with a customer who, because of previous negotiations, hasn’t had an increase for two years and they are currently refusing point blank to accept any increases this year. Suffice to say, we have implemented our right to charge and they have cancelled the contract and are refusing to pay our invoices! To make matters worse, we are now burdened with legal costs as we take action to recover our premature termination losses and unpaid invoices which could take years to recover. The truth of the matter is, many in the waste management industry are the first in line to collect the tax for the government and we remain increasingly vulnerable. Waste carriers have become unpaid landfill tax collectors for H.M. Customs and the amounts we collect continue to grow significantly each year. This incurs more admin costs and the risks are becoming so great that, if a waste producer goes bust, the debt associated with the landfill tax could easily be 60% of your invoice total. And if you can’t stand the hit, you could find yourself in the hands of the receivers.
We recognised the impending problems 12 years ago and raised these very issues with the then Prime Minister, John Major, and the Treasury MP David Heathcoat-Amory. Suffice to say, the door was closed in my face and that’s the way it’s stayed ever since. Behind that door today sits Mr Darling. He needs to recognise these problems and provide our industry with some protection, similar to the bad debt relief afforded to landfill operators. Quite why the like of the ESA (The Environmental Services Association) have never addressed these matters is a mystery. I know for a fact that the Road Haulage Association waste group has raised concerns, so someone else is speaking out but what’s needed is a collective voice.
I’m sure many people involved in the waste management industry will relate to my concerns. I for one will be writing to my M.P. and the Chancellor expressing my unease. If you share my sentiments you will do the same.
Regards,
Peter Allen
Director, ISM Waste Recycling
THE SKIP SAYS: Thanks for your letter, Peter. Your frustration is no doubt echoed throughout the industry. It’s great to hear of people like yourself taking action rather than just accepting what is handed down. Is anyone else out there joining Peter in making a stand against this? Let us know.

You are here: Home » Readers' Letters

Frustrated

Posted on: June 16th, 2008 by Dave No Comments

Dear The Skip,
It drives me mad trying to create a set of basic strong conditions of skip hire that will protect us, the hirer, from damages caused to customer property when they ask us to come off road and onto their private land due to weak drives, soft ground or overfilled skips. Also, responsibilities for skip theft or damage due to mishandling or fire.
I think it would be useful for us all to create a British standard set of conditions that is fair and would stand up in court if necessary.
What do you reckon?
Regards,
Rick Allan
Brampton Skips
THE SKIP SAYS: Thanks Rick. It does seem to be a common problem which rears it’s ugly head far too often, this one. Any rational human being would conclude that if the customer asks you to take the skip onto their property, they have to accept responsibility for any damage to lawns etc. that would reasonably be expected to occur as a result of doing so.
Sadly, though, history would suggest that the customer, and in some cases even the law, often fails to see it this way.
There must be a fairly concise, cast-iron disclaimer that can be included in the hire agreement? Has anyone perfected such a document that has withstood scrutiny? If so, get in touch with us and share the details – anyone who’s cracked this persistent annoyance deserves recognition!

You are here: Home » Readers' Letters

A warning to fellow skip companies

Posted on: June 14th, 2008 by Dave No Comments

Dear The Skip,
Having just received the May edition I noticed your article relating to Countrywide Skips (The Skip, issue 34, page 5). As a supplier for Countrywide Skips we have found ourselves in a very similar situation as the other skip companies.
We have recently been approached by a company named The Global Skip Company Ltd (registration number 06552836) to open an account. Upon doing our credit check we noticed that it is the company secretary of Countrywide Skips setting up a new company. I am giving you this information to warn other skip companies to tread very carefully with them if at all they anticipate doing business… we for one certainly won’t be!!
Regards,
Carol Scammell,
Holywell Haulage

THE SKIP SAYS: Thanks for bringing this to everyone’s attention, Carol. Obviously, there is nothing illegal about this kind of activity, but it’s always best to know as much as possible about who you’re getting involved with and some companies may be deterred by this connection.